{"id":2058,"date":"2011-03-11T10:12:49","date_gmt":"2011-03-11T18:12:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bridgehands.com\/bridgeblog\/?p=2058"},"modified":"2013-02-15T21:33:10","modified_gmt":"2013-02-16T05:33:10","slug":"polling-you-51-slam-1430-rkc-vs-blackwood-day-11-march-11-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.bridgehands.com\/bridgeblog\/?p=2058","title":{"rendered":"Polling You #51: Slam 1430 RKC vs Blackwood, Day 11, March 11, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>1430 RKC versus Classic Blackwood: Slams in Contract Bridge<\/h2>\n<p><noscript><br \/>\nJavaScript needs to be enabled for polling to work.<br \/>\n<a href='http:\/\/www.constantcontact.com\/survey\/index.jsp?cc=ViraWidPOL'>Online Surveys<\/a> by Constant Contact.<\/noscript><strong><strong><strong><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/bridgehands-videos.s3.amazonaws.com\/Polling_You_51_Part_1\/Polling_You_51_Part_1.html\">Click here to view Part 1 of the video commentary<\/a><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>BridgeHands<\/em> members &#8211; after logging in, please scroll down to view text and video&#8230;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>On Polling You #51, let&#8217;s compare the 1430 RKC Blackwood convention to the classic Blackwood bid.\u00a0 No convention is flawless yet as the saying goes, &#8220;with great power comes great responsibility.&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>So while it sounds cool to have a handy tool that discloses extra honor information for the same price, the cost of admission is increased complexity.\u00a0And in the shadow of complexity lurks the opportunity for confusion.\u00a0 So what&#8217;s an inspiring Bridge player to do?\u00a0 For 1430 RKC types, it&#8217;s all about practice.\u00a0 And for classic Blackwood bidders, focus on your bidding before launching into a 4 Notrump Ace asking sequence &#8211; much can be learned before the auction gets into thin air.\u00a0\u00a0 Okay, here&#8217;s your chance to share your thoughts on slam bidding and learn some easily overlooked factors to improve your bidding accuracy.<\/strong><\/p>\n<div><strong><!--more-->Possible Blackwood Shortcomings:<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>Trump King &#8211; Status unknown at the 5 level of bidding.<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>Trump Queen &#8211; Status always a mystery.<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>Double Count Quandary: Possible double counting on a side suit, preferable to hold Trump King-Queen.<br \/>\nClassic Blackwood Players Must Carefully Consider Hand Evaluation:<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>Cuebid Aces\/Kings instead of quickly launching into 4 Notrump Ace ask, despite holding 29+ total points.<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>Avoid Blackwood lacking controls in a side suit.<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>Consider implications of prior limiting bid: Notrump, limit raise, signoff bids.<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>Blackwood response point count analysis:<br \/>\nEvaluate response to 4 Notrump Ace ask.<br \/>\nConsider location of trump King and Queen.<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>Example:<br \/>\n1S &#8211; 3S;<br \/>\n4N &#8211; 5H;\u00a0\u00a0 2 Aces, classic Blackwood.<br \/>\nThus, if opener has 1 Ace, 3 outside Kings, and 4 Queens&#8230;<br \/>\nPartner is likely to hold the trump King and\/or Queen.<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>Value Aces and Kings over points associated with Queens and Jacks, especially in slam zone.<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>Value extra trump, with Ace-King and a 9 card suit the Queen will drop doubleton 40 percent of the time.\u00a0 With a 10 card 10, the Queen will drop doubleton 78 percent of the time.<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>Be careful not to overvalue a &#8220;working split honor combination&#8221; &#8211; solid suits are best (for pitching, too).<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>Secondary trump honors are helpful &#8211; finesse opportunity.<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>Use caution whe holding an unguarded split King &#8211; Jack requiring a 50-50 finesse chance (unless you can somehow endplay an opponent).<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>Shape Matters!\u00a0 Value length and shortness.<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>Be wary of doubleton split honor suits\u00a0(Ace-Queen or King -Jack).\u00a0 Partner may hold the same!<\/strong><\/div>\n<div><strong>Mirrored tripletons can also create problems:<br \/>\nPrefer 5-4-3-1 and 5-4-2-2 or even a 4-4-3-2 over a 5-3-3-2 holding.<br \/>\nWorse yet, be wary of the 4-3-3-3 flat hand &#8211; no ruffing values.<br \/>\nClassic Blackwood or 1430 RKC?<\/strong><\/div>\n<p><strong>1430 RKC:<br \/>\nTrump King and Queen &#8211; immediate status.<br \/>\nMethods may be use elsewhere (Minor, Gerber Mini-Max).<br \/>\nWith sophistication comes complexity.<br \/>\nExample:<br \/>\n2C &#8211; 2D;<br \/>\n2H &#8211; 4N;<br \/>\n5D &#8211; ?<br \/>\nCannot Queen ask here.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Always consider first showing support and cuebidding controls over the 4 Notrump jump:<br \/>\n2C &#8211; 2D;<br \/>\n2H &#8211; 3H;<br \/>\n4N &#8211; 5C;\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Responder show 1 Ace in 14-30 style.<br \/>\n5D &#8211; 5H&#8230;\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Now responder can easily respond to an Ace ask (first step denies).<br \/>\nClassic Blackwood:<br \/>\nTrump King and Queen &#8211; &#8220;Might&#8221; be deduced after a player makes a limit raise.<br \/>\nCarefully consider pre-Blackwood hand evaluation.<br \/>\nLess complex &#8211; avoids some\u00a0mis-evaluation issues.<br \/>\nLess confusing &#8211; avoids some partnership misunderstandings.<\/p>\n<p><strong><strong><strong>Free, Premium and ULTRA members &#8211; please login to view video of additional hand\/s <\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><strong><strong>Please login or register to view this content.<\/strong><\/p>\nPlease login or register to view this content.\n<p><strong>Happy Bridge Trails and Tales,<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>BridgeHands<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>1430 RKC versus Classic Blackwood: Slams in Contract Bridge JavaScript needs to be enabled for polling to work. Online Surveys by Constant Contact.Click here to view Part 1 of the video commentary BridgeHands members &#8211; after logging in, please scroll down to view text and video&#8230; On Polling You #51, let&#8217;s compare the 1430 RKC [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[39],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bridgehands.com\/bridgeblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2058"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bridgehands.com\/bridgeblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bridgehands.com\/bridgeblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bridgehands.com\/bridgeblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bridgehands.com\/bridgeblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2058"}],"version-history":[{"count":22,"href":"https:\/\/www.bridgehands.com\/bridgeblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2058\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2060,"href":"https:\/\/www.bridgehands.com\/bridgeblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2058\/revisions\/2060"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.bridgehands.com\/bridgeblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2058"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bridgehands.com\/bridgeblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2058"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.bridgehands.com\/bridgeblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2058"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}